Let us read verses 17-22
17 Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour,
especially they who labour in the word and doctrine.
18 For the scripture saith, Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth
out the corn. And, The labourer is worthy of his reward.
19 Against an elder receive not an accusation, but before two or three
witnesses.
20 Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.
21 I charge thee before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, and the elect
angels, that thou observe these things without preferring one before
another, doing nothing by partiality.
22 Lay hands suddenly on no man, neither be partaker of other men's
sins: keep thyself pure.
Now to the Barclay commentary:
RULES FOR PRACTICAL ADMINISTRATION
1 Timothy 5:17–22
First, the paraphrase of the verse from the
commentary:
Let elders who discharge their duties well be judged
worthy of double honour, especially those who toil
in preaching and in teaching; for Scripture says:
‘You must not muzzle the ox when he is treading the
corn’, and ‘The workman deserves his pay.’
Do not accept an accusation against an elder unless
on the evidence of two or three witnesses.
Rebuke those who persist in sin in the presence of
all, so that the others may develop a healthy fear
of sinning
I adjure you before God and Christ Jesus and the
chosen [elect] angels that you keep these regulations
impartially, and that you do nothing because of your
own prejudices or predilection.
Do not be too quick to lay your hands on any man,
and do not share the sins of others. Keep yourself
pure.
HERE is a series of the most practical regulations
for the life and administration of the Church.
(1) Elders are to be properly honoured and properly
paid. When threshing was done in the middle east,
the sheaves of corn were laid on the
threshing-floor; then oxen in pairs were driven
repeatedly across them; or they were tethered to a
post in the middle and made to march round and round
on the grain; or a threshing sledge was harnessed to
them and the sledge was drawn to and fro across the
corn. In all cases, the oxen were left unmuzzled and
were free to eat as much of the grain as they
wanted, as a reward for the work they were doing.
The actual law that the ox must not be muzzled is in
Deuteronomy 25:4.
The saying that the laborer deserves to be paid is a
saying of Jesus (Matthew 10:10). It is most likely a
proverbial saying which he quoted. Everyone who
works deserves financial support; and the harder
people work, the more they deserve. Christianity has
never had anything to do with the sentimental ethic
which clamors for equal shares for all. The reward
must always be proportionate to the level of toil.
Quoted verse:
Matthew 10:10b
...for the workman is worthy of his
meat.
It is to be noted what kind of elders are to be
especially honoured and rewarded. It is those who
toil in preaching and teaching. The elder whose
service consisted only in words and discussion and
argument is not in question here. Those whom the
Church really honoured were the ones who worked to
edify and build it up by preaching the truth and by
educating the young and the new converts in the
Christian way.
(2) It was Jewish law that no one should be
condemned on the evidence of a single witness: ‘A
single witness shall not suffice to convict a person
of any crime or wrongdoing in connection with any
offence that may be committed. Only on the evidence
of two or three witnesses shall a charge be
sustained’ (Deuteronomy 19:15). The Mishnah, the
codified Rabbinic law, in describing the process of
trial, says: ‘The second witness was likewise
brought in and examined. If the testimony of the two
was found to agree, the case for the defence was
opened.’ If a charge was supported by the evidence
of only one witness, it was held that there was no
case to answer.
Quoted verse:
Deuteronomy 19:15 but I will read verses 15 through
21. These scriptures are linked clearly to the
instructions in Matthew 18 or the "offending brother
resolution instructions." The God-given
concepts are equal.
Deuteronomy 19:15-21
15 One witness shall not rise up against a man for
any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he
sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the
mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be
established.
16 If a false witness rise up against any man to
testify against him that which is wrong;
17 Then both the men, between whom the controversy
is, shall stand before the LORD, before the priests
and the judges, which shall be in those days;
18 And the judges shall make diligent inquisition:
and, behold, if the witness be a false witness, and
hath testified falsely against his brother;
19 Then shall ye do unto him, as he had thought to
have done unto his brother: so shalt thou put the
evil away from among you.
20 And those which remain shall hear, and fear, and
shall henceforth commit no more any such evil among
you.
21 And thine eye shall not pity; but life shall go
for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for
hand, foot for foot.
In later times, church regulations laid it down that
the two witnesses must be Christian [Spirit-holding
firstfruits], for it would
have been easy for a malicious non-Christian to make
up a false charge against a Christian elder in order
to discredit him, and through him to discredit the
Church. In the early days, the Church authorities
did not hesitate to apply discipline; and Theodore
of Mopseuestia, one of the early fathers who lived
in the late fourth and early fifth centuries, points
out how necessary this regulation was, because the
elders were always liable to be disliked and were
especially open to malicious attack ‘due to the
retaliation by some who had been rebuked by them for
sin’. Those who had been disciplined might well seek
to get their own back by maliciously charging an
elder with some irregularity or some sin.
The fact remains that this would be a happier world
– and the Church, too, would be happier – if people
would realize that it is nothing less than sin to
spread stories of whose truth they are not sure.
Irresponsible, slanderous and malicious talk does
infinite damage and causes infinite heartbreak, and
such talk will not go unpunished by God.
(3) Those who persist in sin are to be publicly
rebuked [meaning within the
congregation of firstfruits]. That public rebuke had a double value. It
sobered sinners into a consideration of their ways,
and it made others take care that they did not
involve themselves in a similar humiliation. The
threat of publicity is no bad thing if it keeps
people on the right path, even through fear. A wise
leader will know the time to keep things quiet and
the time for public rebuke. But, whatever happens,
the Church must never give the impression that it is
condoning sin.
(4) Timothy is urged to administer his office
without favoritism or prejudice. The biblical
scholar B. S. Easton writes: ‘The well-being of
every community depends on impartial discipline.’
Nothing does more harm than when some people are
treated as if they could do no wrong and others as
if they could do no right. Justice is a universal
virtue, and the Church must surely never fall below
the impartial standards which even the world
demands.
(5) Timothy is warned not to be too hasty ‘in laying
hands on any man’. That may mean one of two things.
(a) It may mean that he is not to be too quick in
laying hands on any man to ordain him to office in
the Church. Before people gain promotion in
business, or in teaching, or in the army or the navy
or the air force, they must prove that they deserve
it. No one should ever start at the top. This is
doubly important in the Church, for those who are
raised to high office and then fail in it bring
dishonour, not only on themselves, but also on the
Church. In a critical world, the Church cannot be
too careful in regard to the kind of men and women
whom it
chooses as its leaders.
(b) In the early Church, it was the custom to lay
hands on a sinner who repented, who had given proof
of repentance and who had returned to the fold of
the Church. It is laid down: ‘As each sinner
repents, and shows the fruits of repentance, lay
hands on him, while all pray for him.’ The early
Church historian Eusebius tells us that it was the
ancient custom that repentant sinners should be
received back with the laying on of hands and with
prayer. If that is the meaning here, it will be a
warning to Timothy not to be too quick to receive
back anyone who has brought disgrace on the Church,
to wait until the individual has shown genuine
[repentance and invoking of
Godly principles-fruit] and a true determination to live according
to that declaration of repentance. That is not for a
moment to say that such a person is to be held at
arm’s length and treated with suspicion, but rather
to be treated with all sympathy and with all help
and guidance in the period of probation. But it is
to say that membership of the Church is never to be
treated lightly, and that people must show their
[repentance] for the past and their determination for
the future before they are received not into the
fellowship of the Church but into its membership.
The fellowship of the Church exists to help such
people redeem themselves, but its membership is for
those who have truly pledged their lives to Christ.
~Barclay Commentary
Now to the commentaries.
This verse is in three phrases:
1] Them that sin.
2] Rebuke before all.
3] That other also may fear.
Some commentaries combine the first two phrases.
1] Them that sin.
Them that sin — whether
presbyters or laymen.
~Jamieson, Fausset, Brown
Them that sin —
Referring to Elders, who, by reason of their public
position (προεστῶτες), should receive public
rebuke. ~Vincent's Word
Studies
Them that sin — Elders.
That sin - Scandalously, and are duly convicted.
Rebuke before all - The church.
~John Wesley Explanatory
Notes
Them that sin - The
elders who continue to sin.
~Robertson's Word Pictures
Them that sin - Whether
they be elders, or private members, if convicted,
rebuke them publicly, for the sake of the lesson to
others. Do not hush the matter up privately.
~People's New Testament
Them that sin - That
have been proved to have committed sin - referring
probably to the elders mentioned in the previous
verse, but giving the direction so general a form
that it might be applicable to others.
~Barnes Notes
Them that sin rebuke before
all - That is, before the members of the
Church; which was the custom of the Jews in their
synagogues. But, if the words refer to the elders
alone, then the transgressing elder is to be
reproved before his fellows, and be tried by them.
~Adam Clarke
Them that sin rebuke before
all - This the apostle adds to the above
rule, to show that he was far from screening wicked
ministers, or elders, guilty of flagitious crimes,
and gross enormities: for these words, though they
may be applied unto, and may hold good of all
offenders, that are members of churches; yet they
seem chiefly to regard elders, even such who sin,
who continue to sin, who live in sin, in some
notorious sin or another; which is evident and
known, to the great scandal of religion, and
dishonour of the Gospel: and so some read the words,
"them that sin before all, rebuke"; not only
admonish once and again, but degrade them from their
office, and withdraw from them, as from other
disorderly persons, and cut them off, and cast them
out of the church, and that in a public manner; and
so the Arabic version renders it, "before the
congregation": which was done only in case of
notorious offences: and which rule is observed by
the Jews. ~John Gill
2] Rebuke before all.
Rebuke before all —
publicly before the Church. Not until this “rebuke”
was disregarded was the offender to be
excommunicated. ~Jamieson,
Fausset, Brown
Rebuke before all -
Before all the church or congregation. The word
“rebuke” properly denotes to reprove or reprehend.
It means here that there should be a public
statement of the nature of the offence, and such a
censure as the case demanded. It extends only to
spiritual censures. There is no power given of
inflicting any punishment by fine or imprisonment.
The power of the church, in such cases, is only to
express its strong and decided disapprobation [dis-ap-ruh-bey-shuhn]
of the wrong done, and, if the case demands it, of
disowning the offending member or minister. This
direction to “rebuke an offender before all,” may be
easily reconciled with the direction in 1 Timothy
5:1, “Rebuke not an elder.” The latter refers to the
private and pastoral conversation with an elder, and
to the method in which he should be treated in such
contact - to wit, with the feelings due to a father;
the direction here refers to the manner in which an
offender should be treated who has been proved to be
guilty, and where the case has become public. Then
there is to be a public expression of
disapprobation. ~Barnes
Notes
Quoted verse:
1 Timothy 5:1
The elders which are among you I exhort, who am also
an elder, and a witness of the sufferings of Christ,
and also a partaker of the glory that shall be
revealed:
Those that sin rebuke before
all - that is, thou needest not be so tender
of other people, but rebuke them publicly.” Or
“those that sin before all rebuke before all, that
the plaster may be as wide as the wound, and that
those who are in danger of sinning by the example of
their fall may take warning by the rebuke given them
for it, that others also may fear.” Observe, (1.)
Public scandalous sinners must be rebuked publicly:
as their sin has been public, and committed before
many, or at least come to the hearing of all, so
their reproof must be public, and before all. (2.)
Public rebuke is designed for the good of others,
that they may fear, as well as for the good of the
party rebuked; hence it was ordered under the law
that public offenders should receive public
punishment, that all Israel might hear, and fear,
and do no more wickedly.
~Matthew Henry
3] That other also may fear.
That others also may fear
- that other members of the Church may have a
wholesome fear of offending
~Jamieson, Fausset, Brown
That others also may fear
- “may keep on having fear” (of exposure). Possibly,
“the rest of the elders.”
~Robertson's Word Pictures
That others also may fear
- That they may be kept from committing the same
offence; compare 1 Peter 2:14. The end of punishment
is not the gratification of the private feelings of
him who administers it, but the prevention of crime.
~Barnes Notes
Quoted verse:
1 Peter 2:14
Or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by him
for the punishment of evildoers, and for the praise
of them that do well.
That others also may fear
- This is the grand object of Church
censures, to reclaim the transgressors, and to give
warning to others. ~Adam
Clarke
That others also may fear
- that other elders, or other members of the
church, or both, may fear to do the same evil
things, lest they incur the same censure and
punishment: the Syriac version reads, "other men";
and the Arabic version, "the rest of the people".
The phrase seems to be taken out of Deuteronomy
13:11. ~John Gill
Quoted verse:
Deuteronomy 13:11
And all Israel shall hear, and fear, and shall do no
more any such wickedness as this is among you. |