We will begin with a reading in the Barclay's
commentary and a portion of the commentary on the
first five verses.
INSULTING GOD
THE heretics of Ephesus were teaching a heresy with
very definite consequences for life. As we have
already seen, these heretics were Gnostics; and the
essence of Gnosticism was that spirit is altogether
good and matter altogether evil. One of the
consequences was that there were some who preached
that everything to do with the body was evil and
that everything in the world was evil. In Ephesus,
this resulted in two definite errors. The heretics
insisted that people must, as far as possible,
abstain from food, for food was material and
therefore evil; food ministered to the body, and the
body was evil. They also insisted that people must
abstain from marriage, for the instincts of the body
were evil and must be entirely suppressed.
This was a constantly recurring heresy in the
Church; in every generation, there were some who
tried to be stricter than God. When the Apostolic
Canons came to be written, it was necessary to set
it down in black and white: ‘If any overseer, priest
or deacon, or anyone on the priestly list, abstains
from marriage and flesh and wine, not on the ground
of asceticism [ə-sĕt'ĭ-sĭz'əm
- extreme self-denial] (that
is, for the sake of discipline), but
through abhorrence of them as evil in themselves,
forgetting that all things are very good, and that
God made man male and female, but blaspheming and
slandering the workmanship of God, either let him
amend, or be deposed and cast out of the Church.
Likewise a layman also’ (Apostolic
Canons, 51). Irenaeus, the Bishop of
Lyons, writing towards the end of the second
century, tells how certain followers of Saturninus
‘declare that marriage and generation are from
Satan. Many likewise abstain from animal food, and
draw away multitudes by a feigned temperance of this
kind’ (Against Heresies,
1:24:2) This kind of thing reached its
peak in the fourth century. At that time, monks went
away and lived in the Egyptian desert, entirely cut
off from other people. They spent their lives in
self-denial and physical deprivation. One never ate
cooked food and was famous for his ‘fleshlessness’.
Another stood all night by a jutting crag so that it
was impossible for him to sleep. Another was famous
because he allowed his body to become so dirty and
neglected that vermin dropped from him as he walked.
Another deliberately ate salt in midsummer and then
abstained from drinking water. ‘A clean body’, they
said, ‘necessarily means an unclean soul.’
~Barclays commentary
1 Timothy 4 and verses 3 and 4 have been used by
some to say that it is permissible to eat unclean
meat. We have a letter in our Letter Answering
Department which speaks to these verses. It
follows:
SUBJECT:
Clean and Unclean Meats – 1 Timothy 4:3-4
QUESTION:
Don’t these verses do away with the doctrine of
clean and unclean meats?
ANSWER:
No they do not.
Here are the verses in question:
1 Timothy 4:1-5
See
lessons for verses 1-5 here
1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the
latter times some shall depart from the faith,
giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of
devils;
2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their
conscience seared with a hot iron;
3 Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain
from meats, which God hath created to be received
with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the
truth.
4 For every creature of God is good, and nothing to
be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:
5 For it is sanctified by the word of God and
prayer.
We have a
large article (actually
3 separate articles in one paper)
on clean and unclean meat explaining all the
scriptures that people use to attempt to make
unclean meats clean. 1 Timothy 4:3-4 is talking
about doctrines of devils and how the false
doctrines stated that we should not eat meat at
all. Notice this excerpt from our article:
NEW TESTAMENT
SCRIPTURES
I have not covered any of the Scriptures in the New
Testament that people will turn to in order to
justify eating "unclean" meats.
They have been quite
thoroughly explained in the past, and I don't think
there is a need for me to go over those verses
again. Most of us would realize that people
twist the verses concerned and read things into them
that are not stated or that are not even being
discussed. My purpose in this paper is not to
convince those people in the world who really want
to excuse their eating of "unclean' meats; they
don't want to be convicted of their wrong ways.
But you who are a member
of God's Church, you who have already lived by these
dietary laws for many years, you who are perhaps
being enticed by clever arguments, you are the one I
would like to make this clear to. I know that YOU
can understand what I am explaining.
If you can understand the
things I have discussed in this paper; if you can
understand God's purpose in creating some animals as
"clean" and others as "unclean"; if you can grasp
that God has planned an incredibly interdependent
environment for mankind, where EVERYTHING fulfills
some purpose and where every action results in a
reaction; if you can understand that God uses
abstaining from "unclean" meats to picture avoiding
taking in the influence of demons, then it is
UTTERLY ABSURD to propose that the dietary laws God
gave to His people Israel are somehow "done away".
As an aside, it is
revealing to notice that one of the doctrines of
demons is ... to abstain from "CLEAN" MEATS! This is
what Paul explained to Timothy...
1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the
latter times some shall depart from the faith,
giving heed to seducing spirits, and DOCTRINES OF
DEVILS.
2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their
conscience seared with a hot iron.
3 Forbidding to marry, [and
commanding]
TO ABSTAIN FROM MEATS, WHICH GOD HATH CREATED TO BE
RECEIVED WITH THANKSGIVING OF THEM WHICH BELIEVE AND
KNOW THE TRUTH (1Timothy 4).
Paul is speaking about
people who "KNOW" the truth of God. They "know"
exactly which foods God has created for us to give
Him thanks for. They are listed and categorized in
Leviticus 11 and in Deuteronomy 14. Those who know
the truth, know this very well. They know that God
never at any time wanted people to thank Him for
"pork chops" or for "lobsters", etc. They know that
God forbids the eating of these "unclean" things.
Don't ever
fall for clever arguments that some parts of God's
laws are done away. Remember that Jesus Christ is
"the same yesterday (i.e.
Old Testament times),
and today (i.e.
New Testament times)
and for ever" (Hebrews 13:8).
---end---
Here is another excerpt
discussing the same verses:
Misunderstood
instructions to Timothy
Still another part of Paul's writings that is often
misunderstood is 1 Timothy 4:3-5, where he speaks of
false teachers "forbidding to marry, and commanding
to abstain from foods which God created to be
received with thanksgiving by those who believe and
know the truth. For every creature of God is good,
and nothing is to be refused if it is received with
thanksgiving; for it is sanctified by the word of
God and prayer."
What was the motivation
of these false teachers? Did Paul warn Timothy
against teachers who would advocate keeping the
biblical dietary laws, or was something else at
work? We know that Paul told Timothy that the Old
Testament scriptures were inspired by God and
"profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for
correction, for instruction in righteousness" (2
Timothy 3:16), so it isn't credible that Paul would
caution Timothy against adhering to instructions
found in these same scriptures.
On the other hand, Paul's
words show us what the real problem was: These
teachers were demanding that people follow commands
not found in the Bible. They were "forbidding to
marry"-which is encouraged, not discouraged, in the
Scriptures-"and commanding to abstain from foods
which God created to be received with thanksgiving
by those who believe and know the truth."
The Life
Application Bible helps us understand the background
of the problem Paul addressed here: "The danger that
Timothy faced in Ephesus seems to have come from
certain people in the church who were following some
Greek philosophers who taught that the body was evil
and that only the soul mattered. The false teachers
refused to believe that the God of creation was
good, because his very contact with the physical
world would have soiled him . . . [They]
gave stringent rules (such
as forbidding people to marry or to eat certain
foods).
This made them appear self-disciplined and
righteous."
No scriptural evidence
exists that indicates that New Covenant Christians
of the early Church ever changed their practice of
following God’s instructions regarding clean and
unclean meats.
Paul
discusses the true source of these heretical
teachings in 1Timothy 4:1: Rather than being founded
in the Bible, these teachings originated with
"deceiving spirits and doctrines of demons." Thus
the problem in 1 Timothy 4 was perverted worldly
asceticism, not obedience to God's biblical laws
defining clean and unclean meats. Paul's perspective
was that "those who believe and know the truth"
(verse 3) would be familiar with the scriptures that
identifying which meats were "sanctified [set
apart]
by the word of God" (verse 5) for our enjoyment. He
encouraged Timothy to remind them to let the
Scriptures be their guide instead of these ascetic
teachers.
In a similar situation
dealing with asceticism masquerading as godliness,
Paul gave parallel instructions: "Therefore, if you
died with Christ from the basic principles of the
world, why, as though living in the world, do you
subject yourselves to regulations-'Do not touch, do
not taste, do not handle,' which all concern things
which perish with the using-according to the
commandments and doctrines of men? These things
indeed have an appearance of wisdom in self-imposed
religion, false humility, and neglect of the body,
but are of no value against the indulgence of the
flesh" (Colossians 2:20-23). This helps us
understand the true nature of the problem Paul
discussed with Timothy: asceticism, not adherence to
God's dietary laws.
---end quotes from the
letter---
Let us now get into the commentaries. We will take
it item for item this time.
Forbidding to marry:
Forbidding to marry
- That is, “They
will depart from the faith through the hypocritical
teaching - of those who forbid to marry;”. This does
not necessarily mean that they would prohibit
marriage altogether, but that it would be a
characteristic of their teaching that marriage would
“be forbidden,” whether of one class of persons or
many. They would “commend” and “enjoin” celibacy and
virginity. They would regard such a state, for
certain persons, as more holy than the married
condition, and would consider it as “so” holy that
they would absolutely prohibit those who wished to
be most holy from entering into the relation. It is
needless to say how accurately this applies to the
views of the papacy in regard to the comparative
purity and advantages of a state of celibacy, and to
their absolute prohibition of the marriage of the
clergy. The tenth article of the decree of the
Council of Trent, in relation to marriage, will show
the general view of the papacy on that subject.
“Whosoever shall say that the married state is to be
preferred to a state of virginity, or celibacy, and
that it is not better and more blessed to remain in
virginity, or celibacy, than to be joined in
marriage; let him be accursed!”
~ Barnes Notes
Forbidding to marry
- These hypocritical priests pretending that a
single life was much more favorable to devotion, and
to the perfection of the Christian life. This
sentiment was held by the Essenes, a religious sect
among the Jews; and we know that it is a favorite
opinion among the Romanists, who oblige all their
clergy to live a single life by a vow of continency
[con -ta -nits cy
-the exercise of self withholding in sexual matters].
~ Adam Clarke
Forbidding to marry
- Which points out not the Encratites, Montanists,
and Manichees, who spoke against marriage; but the
Papists, who forbid it to their priests under a
pretence of purity and holiness, and at the same
time allow them to live in all manner of debauchery
and uncleanness; for these are the persons that
forbid marriage in an authoritative way, and in
hypocrisy: for that phrase is to be joined to all
the sentences that follow it; as through the
hypocrisy of those whose consciences are seared; and
through the hypocrisy of those that forbid marriage
to their priests, this being, by the common people,
taken as an instance of great purity and holiness,
and hereby they are drawn into the deception; as
well as also through the hypocrisy of those that
command ~John Gill
To abstain from meats:
To abstain from meats
- Both among the heathens, Jews, and Romanists,
certain meats were prohibited; Some always, others
at particular times. This the apostle informs us was
directly contrary to the original design of God; and
says that those who know the truth, know this.
~Adam Clarke
to abstain from meats
- not from some certain meats forbidden by the law
of Moses, as did some judaizing Christians; but from
all meats at some certain season of the year, as at
what they call the Quadragesima or Lent, and at some
days in the week, as Wednesdays and Fridays; and
this all under an hypocritical pretence of holiness,
and temperance, and keeping under the body, and of
mortification; when they are the greatest pamperers
of their bodies, and indulge themselves in all
manner of sensuality: the evil of this is exposed by
the apostle. ~ John
Gill
Now from the Jamieson, Fausset, Brown:
Sensuality leads to false spiritualism. Their
own inward impurity is reflected in their eyes in
the world without them, and hence their asceticism [ə-sĕt'ĭ-sĭz'əm
- extreme self-denial]
(Titus 1:14-15) [Wiesinger]. By a spurious [false]
spiritualism (2 Timothy 2:17-18), which made moral
perfection consist in abstinence from outward
things, they pretended to attain to a higher
perfection. Matthew 19:10-12 (compare 1 Corinthians
7:8, 1 Corinthians 7:26, 1 Corinthians 7:38) gave a
seeming handle to their “forbidding marriage”
(contrast 1 Timothy 5:14); and the Old Testament
distinction as to clean and unclean, gave a pretext
for teaching to “abstain from meats” (compare
Colossians 2:16-17, 20-23). As these Judaizing
Gnostics combined the harlot or apostate Old
Testament Church with the beast (Revelation 17:3),
or Gnostic spiritualizing anti-Christianity, so
Rome’s Judaizing elements (1 Timothy 4:3) shall
ultimately be combined with the open worldly-wise
anti-Christianity of the false prophet or beast (1
Timothy 6:20-21; Colossians 2:8; 1 John 4:1-3;
Revelation 13:12-15). Austerity gained for them a
show of sanctity while preaching false doctrine
(Colossians 2:23). Eusebius [Ecclesiastical
History, 4.29]
quotes from Irenaeus [1.28] a statement that
Saturninus, Marcion, and the Encratites preached
abstinence from marriage and animal meats. Paul
prophetically warns against such notions, the seeds
of which already were being sown (1 Timothy 6:20; 2
Timothy 2:17-18-
both already quoted above).
~Jamieson, Fausset,
Brown
Quoted verses:
Titus 1:14-15
14 Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and
commandments of men, that turn from the truth.
15 Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them
that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure;
but even their mind and conscience is defiled.
2 Timothy 2:17-18
17 And their word will eat as doth a canker: of whom
is Hymenaeus and Philetus;
18 Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that
the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the
faith of some.
Matthew 19:10-12
10 His disciples say unto him, If the case of the
man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry.
11 But he said unto them, All men cannot receive
this saying, save they to whom it is given.
12 For there are some eunuchs, which were so born
from their mother's womb: and there are some
eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there
be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for
the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to
receive it, let him receive it.
1 Corinthians 7:8
I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, It is
good for them if they abide even as I.
1 Corinthians 7:26
I suppose therefore that this is good for the
present distress, I say, that it is good for a man
so to be.
1 Corinthians 7:38
So then he that giveth her in marriage doeth well;
but he that giveth her not in marriage doeth better.
1 Timothy 5:14
I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear
children, guide the house, give none occasion to the
adversary to speak reproachfully.
Colossians 2:16-17,
20-23
16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in
drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new
moon, or of the sabbath days:
17 Which are a shadow of things to come; but the
body is of Christ.
20 Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the
rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the
world, are ye subject to ordinances,
21 (Touch not; taste not; handle not;
22 Which all are to perish with the using;) after
the commandments and doctrines of men?
23 Which things have indeed a shew of wisdom in will
worship, and humility, and neglecting of the body;
not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh.
Revelation 17:3
So he carried me away in the spirit into the
wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet
coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having
seven heads and ten horns.
1 Timothy 4:3
see lesson for this verse
Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from
meats, which God hath created to be received with
thanksgiving of them which believe and know the
truth.
1 Timothy 6:20-21
20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy
trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and
oppositions of science falsely so called:
21 Which some professing have erred concerning the
faith. Grace be with thee. Amen. The first to
Timothy was written from Laodicea, which is the
chiefest city of Phrygia Pacatiana.
Colossians 2:8
Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and
vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the
rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
1 John 4:1-3
1 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the
spirits whether they are of God: because many false
prophets are gone out into the world.
2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit
that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the
flesh is of God:
3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus
Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this
is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard
that it should come; and even now already is it in
the world.
Revelation 13:12-15
12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first
beast before him, and causeth the earth and them
which dwell therein to worship the first beast,
whose deadly wound was healed.
13 And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh
fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight
of men,
14 And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the
means of those miracles which he had power to do in
the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on
the earth, that they should make an image to the
beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
15 And he had power to give life unto the image of
the beast, that the image of the beast should both
speak, and cause that as many as would not worship
the image of the beast should be killed.
Colossians 2:23
Which things have indeed a shew of wisdom in will
worship, and humility, and neglecting of the body;
not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh.
Now I want to look at the People's New Testament
commentary on the three portions of this verse:
Forbidding to marry
- Not long after Paul's time the superior holiness
of the unmarried life began to be preached in the
church, and this resulted at last in monasticism and
a celibate clergy.
Commanding to abstain
from meats - The
ascetic practices which began to grow up in the
church a little later extended to foods. To eat the
least palatable food which would sustain life was
counted a virtue. These ascetics generally forbade
animal food, and some lived only on bread and water.
These practices are still found among certain orders
of the Latin and Eastern churches.
Which God hath created
- The foods which God hath created are for use, to
be eaten thankfully by those who know the truth,
instead of having their minds darkened by delusions.
~People's New
Testament commentary
The last phrase in the verse is speaking to the fact
that God created everything for a purpose and that
part of the animal kingdom was good for food [that
is, the clean meats]
We are not to make something God made or the purpose
evil and therefore abstain from it. God made
the beef cow for food and He made the crab and other
shellfish for the cleaning of the ocean. We
are not to condemn the pig or the crab because it is
not good for food. We are to know and
understand the purpose of creation and not attempt
to make ourselves more righteous or as the Barclay
commentary stated, "stricter than God" in our view
of things. Notice the Jamieson, Fausset, Brown
on this:
and know the truth
- explanatory and defining who are “they which
believe.” Translate as Greek, “and have full
knowledge of the truth” (see on Philippians 1:9).
Thus he contradicts the assumption of superior
knowledge and higher moral perfection, put forward
by the heretics, on the ground of their abstinence
from marriage and meats. “The truth” stands in
opposition to their “lies” (1Timothy 4:2).
Jamieson, Fausset,
Brown
Quoted verses:
1 Timothy 4:2
see lesson for this verse
Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience
seared with a hot iron;
Philippians 1:9
And this I pray, that your love may abound yet more
and more in knowledge and in all judgment [discerning].
So to recap here in context, the first three
scriptures:
Verse 1: In the latter times some will depart the
faith by the act of giving heed to false doctrines.
Verse 2: They will listen to people who's conscience
is seared with a hot iron. The Barclay says, "Persons
pretending, not only to Divine inspiration, but also
to extraordinary degrees of holiness, self-denial,
mortification, etc., in order to accredit the lies
and false doctrines which they taught." We see
this demonstrated in verse 3.
Verse 3: First the false
doctrines and the fact that faithful firstfruits
know the truth and can see both the false doctrine
and the self-righteousness of these individuals in
their humanizing of both the law and the purposes of
creation.
|